<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Paramore &#8211; Brand New Eyes, Album Review</title> <atom:link href="http://prettymuchamazing.com/music/paramore-brand-new-eyes-album-review/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://prettymuchamazing.com/music/paramore-brand-new-eyes-album-review</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 11:10:25 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: YNNNNNNNA</title><link>http://prettymuchamazing.com/music/paramore-brand-new-eyes-album-review/comment-page-1#comment-51575</link> <dc:creator>YNNNNNNNA</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 00:16:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://prettymuchamazing.com/?p=13150#comment-51575</guid> <description>I really did like the album but then again I&#039;m a big fan... when i try to get other people to listen to it I get the same results, to others it&#039;s okay, but to me I love it.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really did like the album but then again I&#8217;m a big fan&#8230; when i try to get other people to listen to it I get the same results, to others it&#8217;s okay, but to me I love it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: jackie</title><link>http://prettymuchamazing.com/music/paramore-brand-new-eyes-album-review/comment-page-1#comment-32549</link> <dc:creator>jackie</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 20:52:49 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://prettymuchamazing.com/?p=13150#comment-32549</guid> <description>hey if certain ppl dont like the songs on the album they dont have to listen to them.there are plenty of ppl including myself who love this album and the band.so dont leave your negative comments.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey if certain ppl dont like the songs on the album they dont have to listen to them.there are plenty of ppl including myself who love this album and the band.so dont leave your negative comments.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jeff</title><link>http://prettymuchamazing.com/music/paramore-brand-new-eyes-album-review/comment-page-1#comment-28825</link> <dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 21:25:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://prettymuchamazing.com/?p=13150#comment-28825</guid> <description>Agreed. Same &#039;ol Paramore... sounds like it could&#039;ve been the double record to the last record.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Nice review Kyle. I&#039;d say 65 is fair. It&#039;s not a bad album by any means... just not all that exciting.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed. Same &#39;ol Paramore&#8230; sounds like it could&#39;ve been the double record to the last record.</p><p>Nice review Kyle. I&#39;d say 65 is fair. It&#39;s not a bad album by any means&#8230; just not all that exciting.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Name</title><link>http://prettymuchamazing.com/music/paramore-brand-new-eyes-album-review/comment-page-1#comment-28824</link> <dc:creator>Name</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 19:45:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://prettymuchamazing.com/?p=13150#comment-28824</guid> <description>It&#039;s more of the same from Paramore, and I like it. That may just be the fact that I love me some pop-punk. In the end, this album is nothing amazing or great outside of the pop-punk arena.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#39;s more of the same from Paramore, and I like it. That may just be the fact that I love me some pop-punk. In the end, this album is nothing amazing or great outside of the pop-punk arena.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jeff</title><link>http://prettymuchamazing.com/music/paramore-brand-new-eyes-album-review/comment-page-1#comment-28533</link> <dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 14:25:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://prettymuchamazing.com/?p=13150#comment-28533</guid> <description>Agreed. Same &#039;ol Paramore... sounds like it could&#039;ve been the double record to the last record.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Nice review Kyle. I&#039;d say 65 is fair. It&#039;s not a bad album by any means... just not all that exciting.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed. Same &#39;ol Paramore&#8230; sounds like it could&#39;ve been the double record to the last record.</p><p>Nice review Kyle. I&#39;d say 65 is fair. It&#39;s not a bad album by any means&#8230; just not all that exciting.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Name</title><link>http://prettymuchamazing.com/music/paramore-brand-new-eyes-album-review/comment-page-1#comment-28531</link> <dc:creator>Name</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 12:45:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://prettymuchamazing.com/?p=13150#comment-28531</guid> <description>It&#039;s more of the same from Paramore, and I like it. That may just be the fact that I love me some pop-punk. In the end, this album is nothing amazing or great outside of the pop-punk arena.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#39;s more of the same from Paramore, and I like it. That may just be the fact that I love me some pop-punk. In the end, this album is nothing amazing or great outside of the pop-punk arena.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Confusion</title><link>http://prettymuchamazing.com/music/paramore-brand-new-eyes-album-review/comment-page-1#comment-28524</link> <dc:creator>Confusion</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 22:11:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://prettymuchamazing.com/?p=13150#comment-28524</guid> <description>I&#039;m glad you didn&#039;t give this album an inflated review. I&#039;ve been hearing people saying this album is a classic and I was getting worried that my ear was missing something. They&#039;re definitely mastering their niche, but it&#039;s pretty much what I expected from them.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;m glad you didn&#39;t give this album an inflated review. I&#39;ve been hearing people saying this album is a classic and I was getting worried that my ear was missing something. They&#39;re definitely mastering their niche, but it&#39;s pretty much what I expected from them.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Henry</title><link>http://prettymuchamazing.com/music/paramore-brand-new-eyes-album-review/comment-page-1#comment-28523</link> <dc:creator>Henry</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 22:08:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://prettymuchamazing.com/?p=13150#comment-28523</guid> <description>Careful: could be on riot, nice album opener though&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ignorance: misery business 2.0, equal worst song on the record.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Playing god: sounds like a fall out boy song.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Brick by boring brick. quality song, too bad they didnt have the balls to have it stripped down, the acoustic version is better&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Turn it off: generic. the last 42 seconds should have been more of the record&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The only exception: sounds like something panic at the disco wrote around the time of pretty odd. too repetitive.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Feeling sorry/Looking up: generic pop-punk songs. sounds like new found glory (i wonder why) the end of looking up is pretty cool i guess&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Where the lines overlap: live version is so much better, i dont know why the studio version is so weak.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Misguided ghosts: top song, probably the best on the record&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;All I wanted: stole the intro from coldplay Fix You, repetitive lyrics, good vocals though&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Decode: equal worst song on the record. why is this even a secret track? i would rather a track that didnt make the cut. seriously if twilight wanted evanescence why did they get paramore?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;65 sounds about right. good that sounding more like their first record. that said, its on par with shitty riot.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Careful: could be on riot, nice album opener though</p><p>Ignorance: misery business 2.0, equal worst song on the record.</p><p>Playing god: sounds like a fall out boy song.</p><p>Brick by boring brick. quality song, too bad they didnt have the balls to have it stripped down, the acoustic version is better</p><p>Turn it off: generic. the last 42 seconds should have been more of the record</p><p>The only exception: sounds like something panic at the disco wrote around the time of pretty odd. too repetitive.</p><p>Feeling sorry/Looking up: generic pop-punk songs. sounds like new found glory (i wonder why) the end of looking up is pretty cool i guess</p><p>Where the lines overlap: live version is so much better, i dont know why the studio version is so weak.</p><p>Misguided ghosts: top song, probably the best on the record</p><p>All I wanted: stole the intro from coldplay Fix You, repetitive lyrics, good vocals though</p><p>Decode: equal worst song on the record. why is this even a secret track? i would rather a track that didnt make the cut. seriously if twilight wanted evanescence why did they get paramore?</p><p>65 sounds about right. good that sounding more like their first record. that said, its on par with shitty riot.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 7/23 queries in 0.010 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: prettymuchamazing.com @ 2012-02-12 19:43:19 -->
